The Question:
The universe is big, really big after all. So big and so old relative to our human lifespan that the lack of any other known intelligent life puzzles us. There is only one beginning to grand civilizations. Should we not question the fact that we are the only known life form?
This thought experiment is commonly known as the "Fermi Paradox".
The story goes that in 1950 Enrico Fermi and his colleagues were discussing the existence of alien life over lunch. The question that Fermi asked the table became infamous in its simplicity: “Where is everybody?” The room fell silent because, well, nobody had an answer. Originally, the question was meant to attack the idea of interstellar travel, the possibility of which Fermi wasn’t confident in. But the question remains: if there were civilizations scattered across the stars by the billions, why haven’t we heard from them? It is from these questions, the Drake equation, and the Kardashev scale that the true paradox was born. The Milky Way is about 10 billion years old and 100,000 light-years across. If aliens had spaceships that could travel at 1 percent of the speed of light, the galaxy could have already been colonized 1,000 times. Why haven’t we heard from any other life? That very question is the Fermi paradox. It has sparked numerous explanations for the silence we’ve been experiencing. Some scientists think that the silence is the product of something they’ve coined the Great Filter, an evolutionary wall impermeable to most life. For these scientists, there are two basic possibilities regarding the Great Filter: it’s either behind us or in front of us. If it’s behind us, scientists have speculated that it may have occurred at the creation of life itself or at the jump from single-cell prokaryotes to multicell eukaryotes. Either way, it implies that we are a rare case and that communication isn’t happening because we’re one of very few, if any, survivors. If the Great Filter is ahead of us, on the other hand, then we’re not receiving communication because advanced civilizations have hit the wall and ceased to exist—implying that we too will hit that wall eventually. Other scientists have come up with other explanations for this literal radio silence. Perhaps most of the universe is colonized and communicating, but we’re stuck in a desolate area far from the action.
Or maybe highly advanced civilizations simply don’t care about communicating with inferior life like us. If they have all the power of an entire galaxy, maybe they can’t be bothered by us and our handheld cell phones.
When thinking about this question we are essentially thinking about a bag of indefinite size filled with an indefinite amount of marbles each one representing one origin story for our current conscious existence and realizing that a majority of conscious beings alive now would be able to observe alien life.
And what a time to be alive! We are undergoing an exponential rate of change in all fields of science. Our rate of change is evolving, and it's becoming clear that by the end of this century life will reach into new deeper depths of what early man could only describe as ‘magic’. This is known as the “knee of the curve” as described by Ray Kurzweil in his book The Singularity is Near. The graph below taken from the book gives deeper insight to this sentiment.
"It occurred to me and others a bit peculiar to have spawned into life at such a time period where anything truly is possible. To be born a mortal, with the human species having just started decoding its own genetic makeup, and showing real merit towards conquering mortality once and for all." - Jack Jay | Philosopher
Compared to the rest of human history, the chance of being alive now is actually not that small. Thus far its estimated just over 100 billion humans have ever lived, so its not too rare, at 7%, that we would be alive now, rather than sometime in the past.
If this chart were to continue (if humanity continues to prosper), then the chance of being born here and now would quickly diminish to a near 0 probability. Now, some people may bring up the possible extinction or end of the graph entirely, or the idea that our future universe residents would stop caring to bring new conscious beings into the world. Which brings to light the greater question that gives rise to Galactic Preschool Theory. If we solve all our problems and have near limitless capabilities because of artificial intelligence and automation, what does population increase look like? What would it be like to be birthed into a utopian environment?
Many people love to throw around the idea that death gives life meaning, and in a very true sense it does. As a polar opposite of the fear of death we are able to learn to love life itself. The new borns into a utopian world would never get the chance to learn this lesson. Is this a necessary lesson only acquired by those who went through the change of mortality into immortality? With truly all the time in the world from the beginning how could one understand any sense of meaning in the passage of time? Without ever having to fear death how could one ever develop a love of life? This idea that death gives life meaning is a common saying when speaking about the prospects of immortality and I agree with the sentiment wholeheartedly, but I believe that the meaning that our fear of death gave us, does not go away when death does. Without this teaching though, someone born into a limitless life could not appreciate it as someone who came from the dystopia prior. Utopia cannot be understood without dystopia preceding it.
Therefore to be born into Utopia, would it not be exactly at the time period we are at now? A time when our lives can have great meaning, and a time where we can learn to love not just ourselves but the world around us. A time when we can use our wits we were given to build things that help the less fortunate of us. A time in which we can earn our rights to the kingdom of heaven.
One point this essay makes is in regards to the super slim chance of having been born into the time we are at now. Compared to the rest of human history, the chance is actually not that small. With 100 Billion people total having passed, there is a decent chance, at 7%, that we would be alive now, rather than sometime in the past.
If this chart were to continue (if humanity continues to prosper), then the chance of being born here and now would quickly diminish to a near 0 probability. Now, some people may bring up the possible extinction or end of the graph entirely, or the idea that our future universe residents would stop caring to bring new conscious beings into the world. Which brings to light the greater question that gives rise to Galactic Preschool Theory. If we solve all our problems and have near limitless capabilities because of artificial intelligence and automation, what does population increase look like? What would it be like to be birthed into a utopian environment?
Many people love to throw around the idea that death gives life meaning, and in a very true sense it does. As a polar opposite of the fear of death we are able to learn to love life itself. The new borns into a utopian world would never get the chance to learn this lesson. Is this a necessary lesson only acquired by those who went through the change of mortality into immortality? With truly all the time in the world from the beginning how could one understand any sense of meaning in the passage of time? Without ever having to fear death how could one ever develop a love of life? This idea that death gives life meaning is a common saying when speaking about the prospects of immortality and I agree with the sentiment wholeheartedly, but I believe that the meaning that our fear of death gave us, does not go away when death does. Without this teaching though, someone born into a limitless life could not appreciate it as someone who came from the dystopia prior. Utopia cannot be understood without dystopia preceding it.
Therefore to be born into Utopia, would it not be exactly at the time period we are at now? A time when our lives can have great meaning, and a time where we can learn to love not just ourselves but the world around us. A time when we can use our wits we were given to build things that help the less fortunate of us. A time in which we can earn our rights to the kingdom of heaven.
Now imagine a time after we create utopia, imagine the new earthlings who are born never understanding what "WORSE" was? Would that ever really be able to appreciate the life they were given? It becomes obvious we NEED to go through the stage we are going through.
So what we could we do in order to bring new conscious life into existence, having the same understanding we did by going through this period, and having them join the greater galactic expanse? It seems all too obvious that at this point of limitless power, the ability to create worlds designed for learning in a controlled environment is entirely possible. Therefore, the chances that we are the first to be going through this process is minimal.
In regards to simulation theory it goes, given we can likely simulate another universe, the chances that our universe is the first aka base reality, is minute compared to us living in one of these simulated ones. Galactic preschool theory has the same merits, in the sense that us not being one of these habitats created for learning and teaching before joining the greater expanse being minute.
With the rise of UFO's in mainstream media, this theory is gaining merit. What was once hidden to us seems as if it is being revealed. It seems only fair to not release such reality shattering info at once, and instead slowly ease the idea into the minds of the preschool students, similar to how we slowly reveal the existence of Santa, The Tooth Fairy, and others to our definition of preschool students.